Collaboration Day 2003
Following the 2003 AAEE Conference at RMIT, a small group of a dozen or so stayed on for an extra half a day to try to define some collaborative projects for action. Some recommendations included:
· Review existing teaching resources and apply for grants to fill some gaps.
· Mobilise the mathematics community.
· Extend the use of project-based learning.
· Teaching Sustainability.
· Establish an information literacy group (eg around Heather Ross at RMIT and others). This links to knowledge management and lifelong learning.
· Establish regional and problem-oriented AAEE groups, with leaders/coordinators/champions.
These ideas might help us make more progress at this year’s Collaboration Day, which will follow the conference on Thursday morning, 9-12 noon. A complete summary of the discussion follows.
Some initial ideas
· Collaboration needs projects and how to accomplish them
· We could share common teaching resources (learning objects)
· We should teach sustainability from year one onwards – leading to profound curriculum change – multidisciplinary case studies and projects
· Mathematics in engineering education needs attention
· Sustainability of learning is helped by activating student-student learning
· AAEE could foster more special interest groups, eg national coalitions/communities of practice
· Systems thinking is important
· Perhaps a national engineering festival?
· What are the fundamentals? Mathematics, chemistry, physics, biology, sociology, law, business, …
· AAEE Design Competitions, reports, essays – provide student motivation
· National curricula?
Some drivers
· Diversity – real problems
· Ingenuity
· Relevance of disciplines – identity of engineering – engineering as an education for life (way of thinking)
· Scarcity of resources within higher ed
· Entrepreneurship – build an alliance with our Business colleagues?
· Structural change
· Infrastructure ($40bn)
· National wealth dependent on engineering innovation
· ANZ School of Government model (multi-university)
Competencies
· Invent/synthesise
· Choose materials
· Manufacture
· Articulate/write concisely
· Modelling
· Information literacy
· Define system/problem boundaries
· Distinguish means and ends
· Critique/feedback/critical thinking
· Conscious of own learning style and needs
· Build relationships
· Listen actively
· Ethics/morals
· Intellectual property
· Conceptualisation
· Parallel possibilities
· Write simple computer models
· Simple electrical circuits
· History
· Build things (with hands)
Projects for students
· Bay Island
· Disability solutions
· Homelessness
· Underwater timer
· Disasters
· Transport
· Energy
· Water
· How to learn
· Future planning
· Biodiesel
· Feeding the world
· Robots
· Manufacturing
· New materials
· Asteroids
· Drugs
· Measuring instruments
· Waste management
· Env. Degradation
· Global trading
Projects for staff (collaboration)
·
Engage with late primary school
(eg IMSAC-PBL @ http://www2.imsa.edu/programs/pbl/cpbl.html)
· Cultural change in engineering
· AUTC review (provide resources)
· Engineering game
· Engineering festival
· Public lectures
· Postgrad cross disciplinary opportunities
· Knowledge management
· Sponsored internships
·
Remodel first year
(eg see Foundation Coalition @ http://www2.imsa.edu/programs/pbl/cpbl.html)
· Map groupwork across disciplines
· Understand similarities and difference between disciplines
· National exams/assessment (eg for entry and for competence)
· Better dissemination of AAEE proceedings
· Regional AAEE groups
· Attract non-eng students into eng courses/subjects/competitions
· Staff development (a GradCert in Engineering Ed)
· Build alliances (eg with design disciplines)
· Attitude changes in first year
· Socio-technical systems
· Trade-off of generic skills and technical skills
· National teaching technologies (review what is available)
· What is the role of universities? Eg provide society’s leaders. Is this what we aim for?
First year
· Socio-technical systems – staff development; AAEE workshops
· Needs to be digestible for a diverse range of students
· Role of service teaching?
· Dealing with attitudes and expectations, eg content (what is to be covered) versus how it is to be engaged
· Lack of resources, eg time and space
· Authentic assessment
· Dealing with large classes – the scalability of student-centred learning
Vision
· A work-like environment – a desk, tools, projects, coaching, reflective activity – active learning
A Schematic

Constraints
· Centralized university practices
· Sense of ownership of the resources, eg rooms, desks, computers
· Proving outcomes (assessment and evaluation)
· Accreditation
· Finding champions within institutions
· Financial impact on all groups, eg service teachers
· Contextualising service teaching
· Technical competencies
· Integration within the curriculum, both horizontally and vertically
· Lifelong learning
Some ways forward
· Mobilise the mathematics community, eg Milton Fuller et al, EMAC, AAMT, Math. Institute
· Further develop the revolutionary vision, eg Nathan Scott, Roger Hadgraft, et al.
· Revisit cultural change – David Radcliffe et al
· Sustainability – Euan Nichol et al
Possible outcomes
· Review of existing resources (with links, eg clearinghouse activity)
· This could enable some grant application to address gaps. Some position papers could prepare the way for this.
· Expand participation (eg following this year’s conference).
· Establish regional AAEE groups, with leaders/coordinators/champions.
· Establish an information literacy group (eg around Heather Ross at RMIT and others). This links to knowledge management and lifelong learning.